Monday, November 30, 2009
NIRVANA MONDAY
MUDHONEY JAMMING WITH KURT COBAIN 1992
DOUCHEBAG REVIEW OF A NIRVANA MUDHONEY SHOW 1989
BUDDYHEAD INTERVIEWS MUDHONEY 2009
Nirvana Monday
Sunday, November 29, 2009
christian-crotch-action: against
the huffington post
these preachers of paradox are fucking crazy- and funny.
Saturday, November 28, 2009
Friday, November 27, 2009
The Condition of the Civilized Human
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Blindside!
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Monday, November 23, 2009
Best of 2009
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Alain Badiou
"The trouble is that, nowadays, the word 'philosophy' is used in an attempt to force upon us quite the opposite maxim, which might read: 'Cling to your illusions, prepare to surrender.' We have seen a 'philosophy' appearing in magazines that looks like a vegetable-based natural medicine, or euthanasia for enthusiasts. Philosophizing would appear to be a small part of a vast programme: keep fit and be efficient, but stay cool. We have seen 'philosophers' declaring that, as the Good is inaccessible if not criminal, we should be content to fight every inch of the way against various forms of Evil, whose common name proves, on closer inspection, to be 'communism', when it is not 'Arab' or 'Islam'. And so we revive 'values' that philosophy has always helped us to get rid of: obedience (to commercial contracts), modesty (in the face of the arrogance of the ham actor on TV), realism (we must have profits and inequalities), utter selfishness (now known as 'modern individualism'), colonial superiority (the democratic goodies of the West versus the despotic baddies of the South), hostility to living thought (all opinions have to be taken into account), the cult of numbers (the majority are always right), obtuse millenarianism (the planet is getting hotter under my very feet), empty religion (there must be Something), and I could go on. So many 'philosophers' and 'philosophies' do nothing to stop this, and instead wear themselves out trying to infect us with little articles, debates, blazing headlines ('The Ethics of Stock Options: Philosophers Speak Out At Last') and boisterous roundtable discussions ('Philosophers: the G-string or the Veil?'). This permanent prostitution of the words 'philosopher' and 'philosophy' (and it should be recalled that Deleuze denounced it from the very beginning), and the media operation that gave birth to the trademark 'new philosophies', will get you down in the long run. At the rate things are going it is not just cafés that will be described as 'philosophical' (these cafés philosophiques really are a wretched invention, and the natural heirs to the cafés du commerce where all that bar room philosophizing used to go on). We will end up going, in all our pomp, to the philosophical outhouse."
Saturday, November 21, 2009
tUnE-yArDs
Petition For The Washington Post To Become A Victim Of The Print Media Crisis
"Their disagreement was echoed and amplified throughout the Obama administration. The secretaries of defense and state came down on McChrystal's side; the vice president and many on the White House political staff with Eikenberry."
Now, the argument implied by including this in the column seems to be that the military knows best about military matters. This is arguably true in theory, but effectively false. The Pentagon will always argue for increased force in situations like this. This is how they receive funding and thrive as a dominant institution. Their voice should not be the only one, or even the primary one, given consideration in matters like this.
"In all this dithering, it's easy to forget a few fundamentals. Why are we in Afghanistan? Not because of its own claim on us but because the Taliban rulers welcomed the al-Qaeda plotters who hatched the destruction of Sept. 11, 2001. The Taliban also oppressed its own people, especially women, but we sent troops because Afghanistan was the hide-out for the terrorists who attacked our country."
This is pathetic. The argument that we are in Afghanistan to liberate its women holds no water whatsoever. This is an argument that always comes after the fact, to promote the continuation of American wars in the Middle East, and is never a primary consideration, or a consideration at all, until it has to be utilized as a talking point. Also, Broder mentions al-Qaeda as a reason for the commencement and continuation of the war without the slightest acknowledgement that they are no longer operating from within Afghan borders.
"But George W. Bush said -- and Obama seemed to agree -- that withdrawal was not an option.
"That imperative is reinforced by the presence of Pakistan, a shaky nuclear-armed power across a porous mountain border. If the Taliban comes back in Afghanistan, the al-Qaeda cells already in Pakistan will operate even more freely -- and nuclear weapons could fall into the most dangerous hands.
"Given all of this, I don't see how Obama can refuse to back up the commander he picked and the strategy he is recommending. It may not work if the country truly is ungovernable. But I think we have to gamble that security will bring political progress -- as it has done in Iraq."
Note the mention of G.W.'s opinion like it holds weight. And of course, when all logic fails to serve your purposes, bring irrational fear into the equation. Broder shamelessly throws in that paragraph laced with fear-mongering of the most despicable kind, introducing the possibility of the collapse of the Pakistani government and subsequent deliverance of nuclear weapons into the eager hands of the Taliban with absolutely no proof or reason to back up this possibility.
Our press fails us once again.
Full article here.
TINY TIM
tiny tim trips on acid, entertains children and warns of global warming all at the same time
Friday, November 20, 2009
I had to...
Ugh, She's Back
It's unfortunately true, America's favorite hockey mom and most offensively ignorant political figure is back in the spotlight. That picture up there isn't even one of the many in-poor-taste photoshopped pictures of her either, but an authentically in-poor-taste picture she consented to. Every time Sarah Palin is in the spotlight, invariably offending intelligent and/or informed people who value truth all around the world, I am tempted to ignore her. The thought process behind this is that she makes me so upset with every world she drawls and I should thus not listen in the interest of keeping my blood pressure down, and that I would like to hope that maybe if everyone just ignores her she will go away. This last thought is incredibly naive, and unfortunately has been the primary response of Barack Obama to the growing chorus of hysterical white people speaking out illogically against him and in favor of people like Palin. People like these:
music.new.z
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Introducing: Charlie Sheen
PBO – And I’d like to believe that I am here to restore that hope. To restore confidence in your leaders, in the system that the voting public chose through a peaceful transfer of power.
(An odd moment of silence between us. Precious time ticking away).
CS – Mr. President, are you aware of the number of days it took to begin the investigation into JFK’s assassination?
PBO – If memory serves I believe it was two weeks.
CS – Close. Seventeen days to be exact. Are you aware sir, how long it took to begin the investigation into Pearl Harbor?
PBO – I would say again about….two weeks.
PBO – I see you came prepared Charlie.
CS – No other way to show up Mr. President. When in doubt over prepare I always say.
PBO – Now you sound like the First Lady.
CS – That’s quite a compliment sir.
PBO – As you wish. Please continue.
-------
PBO – Of course this information worries me, yet it’s not nearly as worrisome as you sitting here today suspiciously implying that 9/11 was somehow allowed to happen or even orchestrated from the inside.
CS – Mr. President I am not suspiciously implying anything. I am merely exposing the documents and asking the questions that nobody in power will even look at or acknowledge. And as I stated earlier, I voted for you, I believed in your message of hope and change. Mr. President I have come to you specifically hoping for a change. A change in the perception that our government has not yet made itself open and accountable to the people. These are your words Mr. President not mine. The lives of thousands were brutally cut short and those left behind to suffer their infinite pain are with me today Mr. President. They are with me in spirit and flesh, and the message we carry will not be silenced anymore by media fueled mantras insisting how they are supposed to feel. Deciding for them, for 8 long years, what can be thought, what can be said, what can be asked.
------
S – Please keep in mind Mr. President everything I’m about to say is documented as fact and part of the public record. The information you are holding in your hands chronicles and verifies each and every point.
PBO – You have five minutes left. The floor is yours. Brief me.
-----
PBO – Well Charlie I can’t say this hasn’t been interesting. As I said earlier you’ve showed up today focused and organized. Regardless how I feel about the material you’ve presented, I must commend your dedication and zeal. However, our time here is up.
(the President rises from his chair , I do the same).
CS – Mr. President! One more second!
(The President starts towards the door – I follow him quickly step for step).
CS – Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President -
(He pauses. We shake hands).
CS – Make sure you’re on the right side of history.
(The President breaks the handshake).
PBO – I am on the right side of history. Thank you Charlie, my staff and I will be in touch.
(I watch as he strides gracefully out of the room, the truth I provided him held firmly by his side; in the hand of providence.)
Wow! This guy is not well! I mean...there's just so much..."Brief me"!!!!!!! The idea that the President of the United States would be easier to reach than other people?? The whole two weeks bit that is clearly written to give Charlie Sheen some fictitious one-up on President Obama!!! This guy is really really really ill. There are so many laughs in this thing it is hard to deal with it without an onset of acute Exploding Head Syndrome obstructing your view of the computer screen. Find the whole thing here, but do not look around the site while you're there, and if you see Charlie Sheen around town, urge him to get on a regular and heavy diet of a cocktail of pharmaceuticals. Like, comatose.
Cake Police and Google
I just wanted to share, that since I started visiting this site a few months ago, the Cake Police blog has gone from not showing up from a "Cake Police" search, to now being the NUMBER ONE RESULT!! I've seen cops eating cake, cakes with pictures of cops, but now that's all become secondary. Good work guys. Hopefully we can conquer the print world in the same amount of time.
THE GOLDSTONE REPORT DENIED BY THE US
"Why would the House go so far out of its way to stamp out even the consideration of war crimes accusations against Israel? And why would Barack Obama, the US president, have pressured Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, not to push (the Goldstone Report) in the UN when he had to know that such actions would cost Abbas most of his little remaining credibility among Palestinians?
There are two reasons for this.
Firstly, if Israel is guilty of committing systematic war crimes across Gaza and the West Bank, then the US, which supported, funded and armed Israel during the war, is an accessory to those crimes.
Goldstone explains in no uncertain terms that Gaza was not an aberration in terms of Israel's treatment of Palestinians.
Rather, it marked not only a continuation of Israel's behaviour during the 2006 invasion of Lebanon, but "highlights a common thread of the interaction between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian civilians which emerged clearly also in many cases discussed in other parts of the report".
It referenced "continuous and systematic abuse, outrages on personal dignity, humiliating and degrading treatment contrary to fundamental principles of international humanitarian law and human rights law".
"The Mission concludes that the treatment of these civilians constitutes the infliction of a collective penalty on those persons and amounts to measures of intimidation and terror. Such acts are grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions and constitute a war crime," the report says.
Put simply, if there is blood on Israel's hands, than it is has dripped all over America's shirt."
DEVASTATION IN ISRAEL
DEVASTATION IN PALESTINE
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Werner Herzog Started A Film School
The Rogue Film School will be in the form of weekend seminars held by Werner Herzog in person at varying locations and at infrequent intervals.
The number of participants will be limited.
Locations and dates will be announced on this website and Werner Herzog's website:www.wernerherzog.com approximately 12 weeks in advance.
The Rogue Film School will not teach anything technical related to film-making. For this purpose, please enroll at your local film school.
The Rogue Film School is about a way of life. It is about a climate, the excitement that makes film possible. It will be about poetry, films, music, images, literature.
The focus of the seminars will be a dialogue with Werner Herzog, in which the participants will have their voice with their projects, their questions, their aspirations.
Excerpts of films will be discussed, which could include your submitted films; they may be shown and discussed as well. Depending on the materials, the attention will revolve around essential questions: how does music function in film? How do you narrate a story? (This will certainly depart from the brainless teachings of three-act-screenplays). How do you sensitize an audience? How is space created and understood by an audience? How do you produce and edit a film? How do you create illumination and an ecstasy of truth?
Related, but more practical subjects, will be the art of lockpicking. Traveling on foot. The exhilaration of being shot at unsuccessfully. The athletic side of filmmaking. The creation of your own shooting permits. The neutralization of bureaucracy. Guerrilla tactics. Self reliance.
Censorship will be enforced. There will be no talk of shamans, of yoga classes, nutritional values, herbal teas, discovering your Boundaries, and Inner Growth.
Related, but more reflective, will be a reading list: if possible, read Virgil's "Georgics", read "Hemingway's "The short happy life of Francis Macomber", The Poetic Edda, translated by Lee M. Hollander (in particular the Prophecy of the Seeress), Bernal Diaz del Castillo "True History of the Conquest of New Spain".
Follow your vision. Form secretive Rogue Cells everywhere. At the same time, be not afraid of solitude.
Epic.
A Moderately Illegal Gift
BIKEPUNX LISTEN UP
A History Lesson:
there was a dutch radical anarchist group from the sixties called the Provos who are pretty much responsible for all the great things about Amsterdam, they staged happenings and protested the shit that needed to be protested.... also they came up with a bunch of plans for direct social change, check 'em:
"The most famous of all white plans was the White Bike Plan, envisioned as the ultimate solution to the "traffic terrorism of a motorized minority." The brain-child of Industrial designer Luud. Schimmelpenninck, the White Bike Plan proposed the banning of environmentally noxious cars from the inner city, to be replaced by bicycles. Of course, the bikes were to be provided free by the city. They would be painted white and permanently unlocked, to secure their public availability. Schimmelpenninck calculated that, even from a strictly economic point of view, the plan would provide great benefits to Amsterdam.
The Provos decided to put the plan into action by providing the first 50 bicycles. But the police immediately confiscated them, claiming they created an invitation to theft. Provo retaliated by stealing a few police bikes.
The White Victim Plan stated that Anyone causing a fatal car accident should be forced to paint the outline of their victim's body on the pavement at the site of the accident. That way, no one could ignore the fatalities caused by automobiles.
Other White Plans included the White Chimney Plan (put a heavy tax on polluters and paint their chimneys white), the White Kids Plan (free daycare centers), the White Housing Plan (stop real estate speculation) and the White Wives Plan (free medical care for women).
Some White Plans were elaborate, others were just flashes of inspiration. "It seemed that proposing a White Plan was almost a necessary exam to becoming a Provo," says Grootveld. The most hilarious of all was the White Chicken Plan proposed by a Provo subcommittee called Friends of the Police. After the police began responding to Provo demonstrations with increased violence. the Provos attempted to alter the image of the police, who were known as "blue chickens," by proposing new "White Chickens," who would be disarmed, ride around on white bicycles, and distribute first aid, fried chicken, and free contraceptives."
unlike us shit-talkin' web-surfers, they got shit done, for instance, this dude was voted onto the Amsterdam city council and check out how qwerm he is:
they also printed a ZINE just like the cake police!!
"In Provo#12 the magazine was described as:
“a monthly sheet for anarchists, provos, beatniks, pleiners, scissors-grinders, jailbirds, simple simon stylites, magicians, pacifists, potato-chip chaps, charlatans, philosophers, germ-carriers, grand masters of the queen’s horse, happeners, vegetarians, syndicalists, santy clauses, kindergarten teachers, agitators, pyromaniacs, assistant assistants, scratchers and syphilitics, secret police, and other riff-raff. Provo has something against capitalism, communism, fascism, bureaucracy, militarism, professionalism, dogmatism, and authoritarianism. Provo has to choose between desperate, resistance and submissive extinction. Provo calls for resistance wherever possible. Provo realises that it will lose in the end, but it cannot pass up the chance to make at least one more heartfelt attempt to provoke society. Provo regards anarchy as the inspirational source of resistance. Provo wants to revive anarchy and teach it to the young. Provo is an image.” "
we should take some cues from these dudes, 1st step, not letting our rock and roll life styles interfere with the completion of the epically important first issue of CAKE POLICE: PHYSICAL COPY
AND ANOTHER THING.... when they disbanded, their head theorist Roel van Duyn went on to start the Kabouter Party in Amsterdam.... you know what that means in dutch? GNOME, MOTHERFUCKERS..... THE GNOOOOMMEEE PARTTTYYY qwerm out
Everyone
Yesterday the new Willowz record, titled Everyone, digitally dropped all over yr faces and you maybe didn't even know it (although you should have because I gave you fair notice here). The record sounds fucking rad, with a strong dose of The Walkmen's sonic epicness added to the established Willowz sound. The album is comprised of ten shortish songs designed to concisely rock your face off, and succeeds on that and many other levels. So head over to your local iTunes and buy this record by Cake Police blood and semen brothers the Willowz because you will love it, because this band is worth supporting, and because Will needs to pay his rent and feed his cats.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Itz a HIT!!
Monday, November 16, 2009
Does anyone listen to Max Tundra?
I generally make one or two epic, life influencing older-musical discoveries per year. Its easy to stay up to date with music that's being released in the present. Its harder to comb through the past's nearly endless stockpile of releases (going back to 1950's or so) to find something that will really deliver to your tastes and satisfy your needs.
2007 was a good one. Got into both Talking Heads and Beach Boys (not to mention 2007 was an epic year for new releases, as well). 2008 was split between Tom Waits, and The Magnetic Fields. Maybe it's too soon and I'm self-biasing, but I think 2009 is going to be remembered as the year when I started listening to Joanna Newsom's first album (infinitely better than Ys, which I already kinda liked a lot), and discovering Max Tundra.
I started with his 2002 album "Mastered By The Guy At The Exchange", its both his best and most accessible. The album is a genre-bender, a trait shared by most of my favorite records. The music is busy and scatterbrained, and sometimes has an aesthetic that will turn people off right away. If you're aware of the talent this guy has, I can't imagine not liking, or at least appreciating, the album. Max (or whatever the fuck his real name is) has the exceptional talent of sequencing noises at all the right places. I really think that being a musician might be a prereq for fully enjoying it. Depending on what track you're on, you'll hear Max out Daft Punking Daft Punk, out Fiery Furnacing the Fiery Furnaces, or out Locusting The Locust (to a lesser degree, obv).
So I guess I posted this with two goals. If you're already a fan of Max Tundra, you're awesome, I'm glad I'm not alone. And if you aren't, maybe you should give it a go? Convincing, yeah?
Prepare To Shit
Nirvana Monday Has Been Cancelled This Week
CREATING A CAKE POLICE ZINE STEP 1
so artistes get to work and send some of your images with some explanation of how it ties in with the theme
weatherboxes@gmail.com
anything is welcome! hit me up!
Hey, What's Been Happening On The Internet Lately?
The Obama Administration’s irresponsible decision to prosecute the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks in New York City puts the interests of liberal special interest groups before the safety and security of the American people.
"This is literally true: the Right's reaction to yesterday's announcement --we're too afraid to allow trials and due process in our country -- is the textbook definition of "surrendering to terrorists." It's the same fear they've been spewing for years. As always, the Right's tough-guy leaders wallow in a combination of pitiful fear and cynical manipulation of the fear of their followers. Indeed, it's hard to find any group of people on the globe who exude this sort of weakness and fear more than the American Right.
"People in capitals all over the world have hosted trials of high-level terrorist suspects using their normal justice system. They didn't allow fear to drive them to build island-prisons or create special commissions to depart from their rules of justice. Spain held an open trial in Madrid for the individuals accused of that country's 2004 train bombings. The British put those accused of perpetrating the London subway bombings on trial right in their normal courthouse in London. Indonesia gave public trials using standard court procedures to the individuals who bombed a nightclub in Bali. India used a Mumbai courtroom to try the sole surviving terrorist who participated in the 2008 massacre of hundreds of residents. In Argentina, the Israelis captured Adolf Eichmann, one of the most notorious Nazi war criminals, andbrought him to Jerusalem to stand trial for his crimes.
"It's only America's Right that is too scared of the Terrorists -- or which exploits the fears of their followers -- to insist that no regular trials can be held and that "the safety and security of the American people" mean that we cannot even have them in our country to give them trials. As usual, it's the weakest and most frightened among us who rely on the most flamboyant,theatrical displays of "strength" and "courage" to hide what they really are. Then again, this is the same political movement whose "leaders" -- people like John Cornyn and Pat Roberts -- cowardly insisted that we must ignore the Constitution in order to stay alive: the exact antithesis of the core value on which the nation was founded. Given that, it's hardly surprising that they exude a level of fear of Terrorists that is unmatched virtually anywhere in the world. It is, however, noteworthy that the position they advocate -- it's too scary to have normal trials in our country of Terrorists -- is as pure a surrender to the Terrorists as it gets."
The level on which these arguments really blow my mind is not necessarily in their cowardice per se, but rather the delusional beliefs that the cowardice rises out of. Namely, that all terrorists are The Joker. Stop taking films so seriously, Republicans! I mean, sure, we all loved The Dark Night (except if we didn't because of how proud it probably made Dick Cheney), but there is an important difference between movies and reality that Republican's parents woefully did not inform them of. In real life, terrorists do not typically allow federal institutions to arrest them in order to execute miraculously improbable escape plans that win them their freedom and allow them to enact even more atrocious acts of violence against unsuspecting civilians. Once they are behind bars, they pretty much just stay there. Unless they are innocent. In which case, they need a trial. And to ensure the fairness of that trial, it has to be public. Basic stuff, really. Someone should start an NGO called Educating Asshole Republicans on the Fundamental Understanding of Criminal Kases, EARFUCK for short.
Next up, Katha Pollitt discussing the betrayal that is the Stupak amendment in the Nation. In case you don't know, the Stupak amendment is an amendment snuck in at the last minute to the health care bill that just passed the house that makes it essentially illegal for health insurance companies to provide coverage on abortions.
"Elections have consequences, you say? Exactly: Obama, the prochoice, prowoman candidate, won. Stupak didn't put him in the White House, and neither did the Catholic bishops or the white antifeminist welfare staters of Beinart's imagination. We did. And we deserve better from Obama than sound bites like "this is a healthcare bill, not an abortion bill." Abortion is healthcare. That's the whole point.
"What makes the Stupak fiasco especially pathetic is the fumbling response from prochoicers. Missouri Democrat Claire McCaskill would not be in the Senate today were it not for prochoice and feminist supporters like EMILY's List. How does she thank us? By telling Joe Scarborough that Stupak isn't so bad, that it won't affect "the majority of America"--just low-income women--and that it's "an example of having to govern with moderates." So people who'll tip healthcare reform into the trash unless it blocks abortion access are the moderates now! (McCaskill took it back later that day, but the damage was done.) If I ever give that woman another dime, shoot me."
I really don't think much needs to be added to this very effective and succinct condemnation, except to say that it is appalling to see President Obama attempt to separate healthcare and abortion, and equally shocking to see this kind of disregard for women's health and safety in a political climate where so-called "liberals" are in complete control. Pathetic.
Finally, this: